Réseaux sociotechniques en évaluation de la santé et application des connaissances

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##: https://doi.org/10.25761/anaisihmt.499
Mots-clés: Application des connaissances, études d’évaluation, méthode

Résumé

 L’application des connaissances scientifiques dans la pratique est un défi permanent dans le domaine de la santé. Dans le même temps, le domaine de l’évaluation de la santé s’est concentré sur la compréhension de la manière de mettre en œuvre et de développer des interventions complexes. Dans ce contexte, la théorie de l’acteur-réseau a offert des contributions significatives à ces études connexes. Cet article vise à présenter les éléments fondamentaux de la théorie de l’acteur-réseau, à réfléchir sur ses contributions à l’évaluation et à discuter de son rôle dans la traduction des connaissances en action. En explorant cette approche théorique, nous cherchons à fournir des idées et des perspectives qui peuvent enrichir la pratique de l’évaluation de la santé et promouvoir une mise en œuvre plus efficace des connaissances scientifiques. Basée sur l’évaluation théorique et l’émergence d’évaluations de cinquième génération, l’évaluation théorique du réseau d’acteurs est proposée pour expliquer et permettre l’investigation des interventions dans le domaine de la santé, en cartographiant sa dynamique et en suivant sa trajectoire. Il est entendu que cette approche favorisera le transfert des connaissances, le soutien aux décideurs, l’amélioration des pratiques dans les services et, par conséquent, l’amélioration de la santé des populations.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Biographie de l'auteur

Vick Brito Oliveira, Psicóloga na Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE); Doutoranda em Saúde Pública IAM/Fiocruz-PE, Recife – Brasil

 

Références

Oliveira SRA, Figueiró AC. Translação do conhecimento e avaliação em saúde: conceitos e perspectivas. Em: Cruz M, Craveiro I, Kabad J,Vitorino S, editores. Avaliação em saúde, Redes sociotécnicas e translação do conhecimento. São Paulo: Hucitec Editora; 2022.p. 23-40

Hawe P. Lessons from complex interventions to improve health. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2015, 36:307–323

Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Em: Law J, editor. Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge?. London: Routledge; 1986. p. 196– 223. [Consultado em 25 de julho de 2017]. Disponível em: http://citeseerx. ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.614.3046&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Latour B,Woolgar S.A vida de laboratório: a produção dos fatos científicos. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumara; 1997

Callon M, Latour B. Le grand Léviathan a’apprivoise-t-il? Em: Akrich M, Callon M, Latour B, editores. Sociologie de la traduction: textes fondateurs. Paris: Mines Paris, les Presses; 2006.p. 11-32

Law J. Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice. 1992, 5: 379–393

Law J, Mol A. Complexities - social studies of knowledge practices. Durham: Duke University Press; 2002

Coryn, Chris LS, Noakes LA,Westine CD, Schröter DC.A systematic review of theory-driven evaluation practice from 1990 to 2009. American journal of Evaluation. 2011, 32.2: 199-226

Brousselle A, Buregeya J-M. Theory-based evaluations: Framing the existence of a new theory in evaluation and the rise of the 5th generation. Evaluation. 2018, 24.2: 153-168

Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A. Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010, 10 (67): 1-11

Cresswell K, Worth A, Sheikh A. Implementing and adopting electronic health record systems: How actor-network theory can support evaluation. Clinical governance: An International Journal. 2011, 16 (4): 320-336

Figueiró AC, Santos MA de, Cruz MM da, Ubarana J, Hartz Z. Implementação de um sistema de monitoramento e avaliação de âmbito federal: o caso do e-Car no Departamento de Monitoramento e Avaliação do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Anais do Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical. 2017, 16: 65-74

Oliveira SRA. Redes sociotécnicas e translação do conhecimento. Anais do Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical. 2018, 17: 97-104

Silva JC, Alves CKA, Oliveira SRA. Cartão de Evento-Crítico: ferramenta analítica para translação do conhecimento. Saúde em Debate. 2019, 43: 10-18

Bisset S, Potvin L. Expanding our conceptualization of program implementation: lessons from the genealogy of a school-based nutrition program. Health education research. 2007, 22 (5): 737–746

McLean C, Hassard J. Symmetrical Absence/Symmetrical Absurdity: Critical Notes on the production of Actor Network Theory. Journal of Management Studies. 2004, 41: 493-519. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00442.x

Levesque JF, Harris M, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2013, 12 (18): 1-9

Latour B. Reagregando o social: uma introdução à teoria do Ator-Rede. Salvador: EDUFBA; 2012

Macdonald NE.Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants.Vaccine. 2015, 33 (34): 4161–4164

Dubé E, Macdonald NE. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2022, 18 (7): 409–410. [Consultado em 13 de abril de 2023]. Disponível em: <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41581-022-00571-2>

Galhardi CP, Freire NP, Fagundes MCM, Minayo MC de S, Cunha ICKO. Fake news e hesitação vacinal no contexto da pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2022, 27(5):1849–1858

Betsch C, Schmid P, Heinemeier D, Lars K, Holtmann C, Böhm R. Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. PLOS ONE. 2018, 13 (12): 1-32 [Consultado em 16 de julho de 2023]. Disponível em: <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208601>

Gooding E, Spiliotopoulou E,Yadav P. Impact of vaccine stockouts on immunization coverage in Nigeria.Vaccine. 2019;37(35):5104-5110

Nobre R, Guerra LDS, Carnut L. Hesitação e recusa vacinal em países com sistemas universais de saúde: uma revisão integrativa sobre seus efeitos. Saúde em Debate. 2022, 46: 303–321. [Consultado em 13 de maio de 2023]. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/j/sdeb/a/c8hrnYQCYB4gPxjhF5jGtbv/>

Canadian Institutes of Health Research. A guide to researcher and knowledge-user collaboration in health research. 2015. [Consultado em 15 de outubro de 2020]. Disponível em: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/44954.html

Clavier C, SénéchalY,Vibert S, Potvin L.A theory-based model of translation practices in public health participatory research. Sociology of health & illness. 2012, 34.5: 791-805

Figueiro AC, Oliveira SRA, Hartz Z, Couturier Y, Bernier J, Freire MSM, Samico I, Medina MG, Sa RF de, Potvin L. A tool for exploring the dynamics of innovative interventions for public health: the critical event card. International journal of public health. 2017, 62: 177-186

Patton MQ. The Challenges of Making Evaluation Useful. Ensaio. 2005; 13(46): 67-78

Publiée
2024-09-19